In recent cases, it has become increasingly evident that Jaggi Vasudev, more commonly known as Sadhguru, is actively working towards destabilizing the core family system, which is a pillar of Hinduism.
As the Madras High Court recently pointed out, the concerning situation involving two daughters of a professor who have dedicated their lives to his ashram raises serious questions about the true intentions behind Sadhguru’s mission.
Hinduism has long upheld the family as an integral part of its societal fabric, and this is symbolized most powerfully in the divine family of Lord Shiva—Mahadev, Parvati, and their children, Ganesha and Kartikeya.
This family represents an iconic system of unity, mutual respect, and responsibility. So how can someone who claims to be a devoted follower of Lord Shiva actively contribute to the breaking of Hindu family values?
It increasingly seems as though Sadhguru has a hidden agenda that is not in alignment with the values he professes to uphold. The Madras High Court’s criticism of Sadhguru has brought this issue into the spotlight.
The two daughters of a professor have chosen to commit themselves to Sadhguru’s ashram, and their decision raises serious questions. Are these choices truly made from a place of free will, or are these young women being influenced to abandon their families and futures for a cause that serves Sadhguru’s personal and organizational gain?
The court highlighted the stark contrast between Sadhguru’s public stance and his personal life: while he preaches detachment and sacrifice, his daughter leads a life of independence and choice.
This hypocrisy is troubling, as it indicates a double standard where the lives of others are treated as mere instruments for his larger agenda.
Family is central to Hinduism, and the responsibility to uphold and protect it falls on each individual. The Shiva family model teaches that devotion to God and duty to the family can coexist in harmony.
It is unsettling to see Sadhguru promoting a lifestyle that encourages young people to distance themselves from their families, thus potentially jeopardizing the very foundation that Hinduism holds dear.
If he truly were a follower of Shiva, he would respect the sanctity of the family unit, not seek to disrupt it. What is most concerning is the growing pattern of individuals dedicating their lives to Sadhguru’s cause, often at the cost of their relationships and prospects.
By sending his daughter to pursue a life of freedom and choice while influencing others to give up theirs, Sadhguru is creating a dichotomy that serves his purposes while destabilizing the lives of those who follow him.
The court’s intervention serves as a reminder that one’s spiritual pursuits should never come at the expense of family values or societal obligations. True spiritual leaders should encourage their followers to strengthen their familial bonds, not break them apart.
The Hindu family system is not just a religious concept but also a cultural legacy that has sustained the community for centuries. Sadhguru’s actions, if left unchecked, could erode the fabric of Hindu society, and this should be a cause for concern for all those who cherish the principles of family, duty, and dharma.
The notion of sacrificing one’s family and future for the personal gain of another individual is not only dangerous but also against the ethos of Hinduism.
In conclusion, the recent events serve as a wake-up call for society to re-evaluate the growing influence of Sadhguru and his teachings. Family should always come first, and no spiritual journey should demand the destruction of the bonds that define us. After all, the family is the cornerstone of any community, and breaking it apart weakens the very structure that holds Hinduism together.
